Our world today revolves around technology. One of the biggest ways technology is
used is for social media, and that is why I decided to write my Rhetorical
Analysis paper on the article “The Revolution Will Not be Tweeted.” The author, Malcolm Gladwell’s purpose
in writing this article is to prove that social media is not an effective way
to motivate people to participate in actions such as standing up for specific
beliefs. Gladwell begins his
article telling the story of the 1960 sit-in protest in North Carolina. Four black college students decided to
sit in a white bar. The protest
grew by the thousands by the end of the week, just because four boys decided to
take a stand. I really liked how
he started out with this because it grabbed my attention from the
beginning. He continues to give a
few more examples of situations, like the first, to prove a point. I think this helped build his ethos and
pathos. He gave specific details
from real situations, which gave him the power of authority. He created pathos because the audience
is emotionally moved by these stories.
He used his word choice very carefully. He did not use too many intense words, but just enough that
it made me feel something. Malcolm
stated that it was scientifically proven that people who are willing to stand
up for a cause that they believe in no matter what the consequence, are able to
do so because they have a personal connection. They have something to fight for and people to fight
with. That makes you
stronger. He then gave a different
example of how social media helped save a man’s life because they were able to
make more people aware of his health condition through the media. He said that social media is a great
way to make people aware of problems occurring in the world, but because you do
not personally know all of your “friends” on Facebook, there is no personal
connection. This proved the fact
that although social media may increase participation, it lessens the
motivation of people to stand up for what they believe. I think this article was
effective. He used excellent
examples that helped me understand his argument better and persuaded me to
believe his point of view. I am
excited to get started on this analysis!
I think this is a good article you've chosen! It's an interesting approach. I'm not sure if I agree with what he's saying, but it'll be an interesting topic to analyze!
ReplyDeleteI almost chose this article, I thought it would be a good mix up to what everyone else seems to be writing about how technology is good for revolutions. Very well said!
ReplyDeleteGreat comments Alexis! I am glad that you are excited to write your rhetorical analysis. It will make it more fun for you to write it. Mine is similar and also about the effects of social media.
ReplyDeleteI've never thought about this issue before reading this. Interesting article.
ReplyDelete