For my Rhetorical Analysis I have decided to write on an
article in Chapter 6-B. It is called, Does Twitter promote democracy? I chose
this because I think it is very interesting how social media plays such a huge
role in our society. In this article it talks about how the President of Chile
and all of his cabinet members have twitter accounts. Their hope is that it
will create more of a democracy and include the say of the people. It also
explains to us how President Obama 20,000 letters each and every day. They are
filtered through and only about ten of those actually make it to the president.
With twitter accounts everyone would be able to speak their minds, but there
still would have to be some sort of filter. This article is arguing that it
would allow constituents to communicate with the community on a more personal
level and actually be able to communicate with them over social media. It may
only be possible at a local level but they say it would be a good idea. Some
politicians used social media to boost their popularity among the voters. It
actually did help some to get elected. Although this may be a good idea, there
is no possible way that Politicians would ever be able to respond to these tweets
and Facebook messages because there would be so many. We need our politician
focusing on the issue at hand rather than staying up all night tweeting
responses and reading thousands of Facebook messages. I just don’t see how this
would be very productive.
This is very interesting! Sounds like there is a lot that can be taken from this article, which you recognize, so supporting your argument should hopefully come easily.
ReplyDelete