The article I have chosen to
examine for this assignment is “Why eat Local” by Dominic Muren. The author is
writing to people that are “increasingly concerned about the quality and
cleanliness of the foods they eat.” Also to those that “want more control over
what they put into their bodies.” The purpose of the author is to convince her
audience of the benefits of eating locally. The author does this by describing
the personal health, economic, and environmental benefits of doing so. Although
the author might have been effective at giving quotes by seemingly important
people or organizations, due to the overall lack of organization and depth, the
article is inefficient at accomplishing its purpose.
I found the organization to be a bit
hard to follow. I’m not even sure if there was a thesis statement. I guess
there is but it doesn’t really outline what the article is going to be about.
Not only is the article not structured well as a whole but, even within the
paragraphs and even within each sentence. There is a very jerky flow to the
article. There was also no conclusion to the article.
Not only did the article lack a
conclusion but also the individual points seemed to lack conclusion. The author
seemed to bring up some interesting points but didn’t bring them to their
complete and logical conclusion. I feel like the points of the article could
have been expounded upon. Overall, I was just left expecting more from the
points.
I really like your insight and analysis of the article. I agree that the more information the better!!
ReplyDeleteWith the OpEd I realized that even though my points and ideas seem to flow logically and coherently around my thesis in MY head, if I don't specifically verbalize HOW those thoughts tie back to my thesis, the reader is lost. It makes sense, because no one can quite think exactly as you do. So it is good to see that new knowledge reiterated here, and I can see now that it really is so important to state direct purposes for including different ideas in an article.
ReplyDeleteI liked how you gave both the pros and cons of the article throughout your analyzation.
ReplyDelete